#201: Use « olena » instead of « oln » as an identifier
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: levill_r | Owner: Olena Team
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Olena | Version: 1.0
Resolution: | Keywords:
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Old description:
We should no longer use « `oln` » ; « `olena` » is
much more clearer.
* The Subversion repository is called `oln`, because `olena` was already
used (arg!); we should not do this mistake again: the future Git
repository shall be named `olena`.
* Likewise, Olena's build farm URL
(
https://buildfarm.lrde.org/buildfarm/oln/) should be renamed to `olena`.
If you find some other places where the project is called `oln` instead
of `olena`, please report them here. TIA.
New description:
We should no longer use « `oln` » ; « `olena` » is much more clearer.
* ~~The Subversion repository is called `oln`, because `olena` was
already used (arg!); we should not do this mistake again: the future Git
repository shall be named `olena`~~ (done).
* Likewise, Olena's build farm URL
(
https://buildfarm.lrde.org/buildfarm/oln/) should be renamed to `olena`.
If you find some other places where the project is called `oln` instead of
`olena`, please report them here. TIA.
--
Comment(by levill_r):
Update the status of this ticket (migration to Git).
BTW, I (Roland) tried to rename the buildfarm from `oln` to `olena`, but I
failed. There are many things to change, including in the Apache
configuration of the !BuildBot masters. I've left the buildfarm as-is for
the moment. I'll try again later.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.lrde.org/olena/ticket/201#comment:1>
Olena <http://olena.lrde.epita.fr>
Olena, a generic and efficient C++ image processing library.