25 Mar
2004
25 Mar
'04
12:22 p.m.
>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille
<akim(a)epita.fr> writes:
>> "Giovanni" == Giovanni Palma
<giovanni(a)lrde.epita.fr> writes:
> Index: integre/ChangeLog
> from Giovanni Palma <giovanni(a)lrde.epita.fr>
> * ntg/core/macros.hh: Add ntg_nbits macro.
> Index: olena/ChangeLog
> from Giovanni Palma <giovanni(a)lrde.epita.fr>
> * oln/utils/buffer.hxx: Add file.
> * oln/utils/buffer.hh: Likewise.
> * oln/utils/key.hh: Likewise.
> * oln/utils/key.hxx: Likewise.
> * oln/utils/md5.hh: Likewise.
> * oln/utils/md5.hxx: Likewise.
I believed we had agreed this was not needed. Because
if it were,
then the code was already available and there was no need to spend
time implementing again.
I am still worried with these changes. Just a few random thoughts,
some of which might even not make sense.
- are you robust to the sex of the machines? (endianness)
- you do save the pictures in files, don't you? So that someone who
is facing a error can at least see the incorrect output.
- if it is not the case, then you just have to change the way you
generate the tests to save the output file, that's a one liner
change. *If* the tests are generated.
- if you save the files, then using md5sum is probably a good means to
compute it.