[Olena-patches] olena-2.0-67-g9aec998 Add Readme files about contests.

* src/contest/DAE-2011/README, * src/contest/hdibco-2010/README, * src/contest/hdlac-2011/README: New. --- scribo/ChangeLog | 8 ++++++++ scribo/src/contest/DAE-2011/README | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ scribo/src/contest/hdibco-2010/README | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ scribo/src/contest/hdlac-2011/README | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 scribo/src/contest/DAE-2011/README create mode 100644 scribo/src/contest/hdibco-2010/README create mode 100644 scribo/src/contest/hdlac-2011/README diff --git a/scribo/ChangeLog b/scribo/ChangeLog index 1ca4fbb..6a68f43 100644 --- a/scribo/ChangeLog +++ b/scribo/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,13 @@ 2012-05-10 Guillaume Lazzara <z(a)lrde.epita.fr> + Add Readme files about contests. + + * src/contest/DAE-2011/README, + * src/contest/hdibco-2010/README, + * src/contest/hdlac-2011/README: New. + +2012-05-10 Guillaume Lazzara <z(a)lrde.epita.fr> + Fix compilation in Scribo. * scribo/primitive/link/merge_double_link_closest_aligned.hh: Add diff --git a/scribo/src/contest/DAE-2011/README b/scribo/src/contest/DAE-2011/README new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c267363 --- /dev/null +++ b/scribo/src/contest/DAE-2011/README @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ + -*- outline -*- + +* Conference +ICDAR 2011 + +* Contest +Document Analysis Algorithm Contributions in End-to-End Applications + +* Description +This contest aims to provide a metric giving indications on the +influence of individual specific document analysis tools to overall +end-to-end applications. Contestants are provided with a full, working +pipeline operating on a raw document page image and proceeding to +extract some final information. The pipeline is built with clearly +identified analysis stages (e.g. binarization, skew detection, layout +analysis, OCR ...) that have a formalized input and +output. Contestants are invited to contribute their own algorithms as +an alternative to one or more of the initially provided stages and +evaluation will be done on the overall impact of the contributed +algorithm to the final (end of pipeline) result. + +* Paper +http://hal.inria.fr/inria-00608371/ diff --git a/scribo/src/contest/hdibco-2010/README b/scribo/src/contest/hdibco-2010/README new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d703113 --- /dev/null +++ b/scribo/src/contest/hdibco-2010/README @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ + -*- outline -*- + +* Conference +12th Internation Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition +(ICFHR 2010) + +* Contest +Handwritten Document Image Binarization Contest + +* Description +In H-DIBCO 2010 (Handwritten Document Image Binarization Contest), the +general objective is to record recent advances in handwritten document +image binarization using established evaluation performance +measures. We will create a benchmarking dataset that is representative +of the potential problems which are challenging in the binarization +process and use a common evaluation platform in order to test and +compare the submitted algorithms for handwritten document image +binarization. + +* Paper +http://users.iit.demokritos.gr/~bgat/HDIBCO2010.pdf diff --git a/scribo/src/contest/hdlac-2011/README b/scribo/src/contest/hdlac-2011/README new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5576882 --- /dev/null +++ b/scribo/src/contest/hdlac-2011/README @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ + -*- outline -*- + +* Conference +ICDAR 2011 + +* Contest +Historical Document Layout Analysis Competition + +* Description +This paper presents an objective comparative evaluation of layout +analysis methods for scanned historical documents. It describes the +competition (modus operandi, dataset and evaluation methodology) held +in the context of ICDAR2011 and the International Workshop on +Historical Document Imaging and Processing (HIP2011), presenting the +results of the evaluation of four submitted methods. A commercial +state-of-the-art system is also evaluated for comparison. Two +scenarios are reported in this paper, one evaluating the ability of +methods to accurately segment regions and the other evaluating the +whole pipeline of segmentation and region classification (with a text +extraction goal). The results indicate that there is a convergence to +a certain methodology with some variations in the approach. However, +there is still a considera-ble need to develop robust methods that +deal with the idiosyn-crasies of historical documents. + +* Paper +http://www.primaresearch.org/ICDAR2011_competition -- 1.7.2.5