[Olena-patches] 2379: Have the compiler check more code, even in NDEBUG mode.

* mln/core/complex.hh (mln::complex<D>::add_face): Use `if (!HAS_NDEBUG)' instead of `#ifndef NDEBUG'. --- milena/ChangeLog | 7 +++++++ milena/mln/core/complex.hh | 17 +++++++---------- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/milena/ChangeLog b/milena/ChangeLog index 44e4772..5ace73e 100644 --- a/milena/ChangeLog +++ b/milena/ChangeLog @@ -74,6 +74,13 @@ 2008-09-23 Roland Levillain &lt;roland(a)lrde.epita.fr&gt; + Have the compiler check more code, even in NDEBUG mode. + + * mln/core/complex.hh (mln::complex<D>::add_face): Use + `if (!HAS_NDEBUG)' instead of `#ifndef NDEBUG'. + +2008-09-23 Roland Levillain &lt;roland(a)lrde.epita.fr&gt; + Make use of the new semantics of complexes in tests. * tests/core/image/complex_image.cc: Update. diff --git a/milena/mln/core/complex.hh b/milena/mln/core/complex.hh index d1e5bad..32197f4 100644 --- a/milena/mln/core/complex.hh +++ b/milena/mln/core/complex.hh @@ -420,16 +420,13 @@ namespace mln typedef typename std::vector< face_handle<N, D> >::const_iterator iter_t; // Ensure ADJACENT_FACES are already part of the complex. - /* FIXME: We need additional macros in mln/core/contract.hh for - big blocks of preconditions like this one. */ -# ifndef NDEBUG - for (iter_t a = adjacent_faces.faces().begin(); - a != adjacent_faces.faces().end(); ++a) - { - mln_precondition(&a->cplx() == this); - mln_precondition(a->is_valid()); - } -# endif // !NDEBUG + if (!HAS_NDEBUG) + for (iter_t a = adjacent_faces.faces().begin(); + a != adjacent_faces.faces().end(); ++a) + { + mln_precondition(&a->cplx() == this); + mln_precondition(a->is_valid()); + } face<N + 1, D> f; /* FIXME: This is not thread-proof (these two lines should -- 1.6.0.1