28 Feb
2006
28 Feb
'06
10:06 a.m.
Thierry GERAUD wrote:
Roland Levillain wrote:
that's an open question?
There are still things to be improved, but at
least we have (almost)
all the desired functionality. The missing features that I can see
...
+# define mlc_super_(T) \
+ set_super_type<T>::ret
do we really need to distinguish between set_super and get_super?