Spam detection software, running on the system "kualalumpur.lrde.epita.fr", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: http://practical.myabsinth.com/dc3r.htmlhttp://highland.myabsinth.com/nothanks.php oaken brittanyadvantage
leroy calfskintiny gyroscope inductteaspoonful agrimony
flashbackcraftsperson sean burpale electrode frazierelephant crispin
barricadeblockade trigonometry calumnyconfuse gilmore
morrissuperannuate [...]
Content analysis details: (19.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
2.1 BAYES_80 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 80 to 95%
[score: 0.8805]
3.0 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08 BODY: HTML: images with 400-800 bytes of words
0.1 MPART_ALT_DIFF BODY: HTML and text parts are different
0.1 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 BODY: Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
[cf: 100]
0.1 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
1.5 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
1.0 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
[URIs: myabsinth.com]
1.5 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist
[URIs: myabsinth.com]
3.2 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the OB SURBL blocklist
[URIs: myabsinth.com]
4.3 URIBL_SC_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the SC SURBL blocklist
[URIs: myabsinth.com]
2.3 LONGWORDS Long string of long words
The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
Spam detection software, running on the system "kualalumpur.lrde.epita.fr", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Meanwhile an informal cease-fire between Indonesian
troops and rebels appeared to have collapsed, threatening to derail
relief efforts remOve Meanwhile an informal cease-fire between
Indonesian troops and rebels appeared to have collapsed, threatening
to derail relief efforts [...]
Content analysis details: (23.8 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
2.3 UNIQUE_WORDS BODY: Message body has many words used only once
0.0 HTML_30_40 BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.5800]
0.1 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 BODY: Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
[cf: 100]
1.5 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP RBL: SORBS: sender is open HTTP proxy server
[221.116.50.252 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
0.4 RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY RBL: NJABL: sender is an open proxy
[221.116.50.252 listed in combined.njabl.org]
0.3 RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC RBL: SORBS: sender is open proxy server
[221.116.50.252 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
3.1 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
[221.116.50.252 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is a abuseable web server
[221.116.50.252 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
3.8 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org
[<http://dsbl.org/listing?221.116.50.252>]
1.0 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
[URIs: spybanner.info]
1.5 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist
[URIs: spybanner.info]
3.2 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the OB SURBL blocklist
[URIs: spybanner.info]
4.3 URIBL_SC_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the SC SURBL blocklist
[URIs: spybanner.info]
2.3 LONGWORDS Long string of long words
The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
Spam detection software, running on the system "kualalumpur.lrde.epita.fr", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Montana Oil and Gas, Inc.(MOGI) To Exp|ore further
opportunities in Alberta Canada, is an energy developer in Canada's
most high|y coveted reservoirs. Aggressive investors and traders may
want to watch Montana Oil and Gas (MOGI) again this morning! Montana
0i| and Gas Inc. (MOGI - News) announces that the Sy|van Lake oil and
gas project is still awaiting a rig at this time. The surface lease
has been constructed and we have been waiting for a rig to become
avai|able for over two weeks, and anticipate this to happen next week
at the latest. [...]
Content analysis details: (8.2 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
1.9 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
2.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
[81.136.168.208 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?81.136.168.208>]
3.1 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
[81.136.168.208 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
When you run make twice, the second time there are still some
compilations performed. In fact, it never pacifies, which is a PITA.
One issue is the following.
In sdf-detgen/src/syn/Makefile.am, we have:
DetBoxedSdf.def: $(BUNDLED_BOXEDSDF)/share/boxedsdf/BoxedSdf2.def
and BoxedSdf2.def is built in boxedsdf/src/syn/Makefile.am (which is
processed earlier, so this is a good point). But the recursive
invocation of all the sub packages implies an installation: that's
what tell Makefile.am:
| $(RECURSIVE_TARGETS):
| @$(mkinstalldirs) $(TMPDIST)
| @set fnord $$MAKEFLAGS; amf=$$2; \
| dot_seen=no; \
| target=`echo $@ | sed s/-recursive//`; \
| list='$(SUBDIRS)'; for subdir in $$list; do \
| echo "Making $$target in $$subdir"; \
| if test "$$subdir" = "."; then \
| dot_seen=yes; \
| local_target="$$target-am"; \
| else \
| local_target="$$target"; \
| fi; \
| (cd $$subdir && \
| $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) $$local_target) \
| || case "$$amf" in *=*) exit 1;; *k*) fail=yes;; *) exit 1;; esac; \
| inpreinstpkgs=false; \
| for i in $(PREINST_PKGS); do \
| test x"$$i" = x"$$subdir" && inpreinstpkgs=true; \
| done; \
| innopreinst=false; \
| for i in $(NO_PREINST); do \
| test x"$$i" = x"$$target" && innopreinst=true; \
| done; \
| if test $$inpreinstpkgs = true \
| && test $$innopreinst = false; then \
| (cd $$subdir && \
===>>| $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) DESTDIR=$(TMPDIST) install) \
| || case "$$amf" in *=*) exit 1;; *k*) fail=yes;; *) exit 1;; \
| esac; \
| fi \
| done; \
| if test "$$dot_seen" = "no"; then \
| $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) "$$target-am" || exit 1; \
| fi; test -z "$$fail"
This piece of code, when going into boxedsdf will install
BoxedSdf2.def again, and then we're good for another set of useless
compilation.
1. Do we really really need to preinstall things like this?
2. If we do, wouldn't it be better to install lazily: only if $cmp
reports the files are different, so as to keep timestamps happy.
This means using another install program...
Spam detection software, running on the system "kualalumpur.lrde.epita.fr", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Goodbye breezy inclinebillboard vexation
angussomewhere hornet dessertarbiter humanoid comptondostoevsky
housebreak guaranteeconvertible snob politicpompous louver
smotherwrapup va satiateroyalty darlene gallhomotopy [...]
Content analysis details: (22.2 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.2 INVALID_TZ_GMT Invalid date in header (wrong GMT/UTC timezone)
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
2.1 BAYES_80 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 80 to 95%
[score: 0.9186]
3.0 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08 BODY: HTML: images with 400-800 bytes of words
0.2 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
0.1 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?216.212.95.82>]
3.1 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
[216.212.95.82 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
1.0 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
[URIs: strippppnow.com]
1.5 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist
[URIs: strippppnow.com]
3.2 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the OB SURBL blocklist
[URIs: strippppnow.com]
4.3 URIBL_SC_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the SC SURBL blocklist
[URIs: strippppnow.com]
0.1 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag
2.3 LONGWORDS Long string of long words
The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
Spam detection software, running on the system "kualalumpur.lrde.epita.fr", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: [...]
Content analysis details: (11.9 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name
0.1 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
1.9 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 0.9981]
0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP RBL: SORBS: sender is open HTTP proxy server
[62.23.232.69 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
0.4 RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY RBL: NJABL: sender is an open proxy
[62.23.232.69 listed in combined.njabl.org]
3.1 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
[62.23.232.69 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
3.8 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org
[<http://dsbl.org/listing?62.23.232.69>]
1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?62.23.232.69>]
1.2 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
0.1 MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER Message-Id was added by a relay
Bugs item #50, was opened at 13/01/2005 15:10
You can respond by visiting:
http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=50&group_id=5
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 4
Submitted By: Valentin David (david_v)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: external redefinitions
Initial Comment:
Since rev 8209 (0.13pre) of StrategoXT, it checks for external redifinitions. short-definition(1,0) and long-definition(1,0) are defined in the SSL but must be redefined in the user program. But it will not compile with library dynamic linking. These strategies are deprecated. We must now use io-wrap(4,0).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=50&group_id=5
