Transformers-bugs May 2004

transformers-bugs@lrde.epita.fr

3 participants
10 discussions

[ transformers-Bugs-27 ] grammar and lists with concrete syntax
by noreply＠lrde.epita.fr 30 May '04

30 May '04

Bugs item #27, was opened at 2004-05-30 12:11 You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=27&group_id=5 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Olivier Gournet (gourne_o) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: grammar and lists with concrete syntax Initial Comment: the following rule: a : |Declaration[ ... ~InitDeclarator+: ys ~ ; ]| -> ls fails at compilation time. moreover, |Declaration[ DeclSpecifier-iter ... ]| doesn't do what's expected. (DeclSpecifier-iter expands in ast like DeclSpecifier) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=27&group_id=5

1 0

[ transformers-Bugs-20 ] check test/disambiguate/anonym-02
by noreply＠gforge.lrde.epita.fr 16 May '04

16 May '04

Bugs item #20, was opened at 2004-05-16 21:45 You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=20&group_id=5 Category: cxx-grammar Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Olivier Gournet (gourne_o) Assigned to: Olivier Gournet (gourne_o) Summary: check test/disambiguate/anonym-02 Initial Comment: This test on anonymous namespace used to pass, but something in 'using namespace' broke it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=20&group_id=5

1 0

[ transformers-Bugs-19 ] For statement
by noreply＠gforge.lrde.epita.fr 14 May '04

14 May '04

Bugs item #19, was opened at 2004-05-14 15:45 You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=19&group_id=5 Category: cxx-grammar Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 4 Submitted By: Olivier Gournet (gourne_o) Assigned to: Clement Vasseur (vasseu_c) Summary: For statement Initial Comment: The grammar is now correct for 'for statement', but it introduced an additional unresolved ambiguity. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=19&group_id=5

1 0

[ transformers-Bugs-14 ] Operator &&
by noreply＠gforge.lrde.epita.fr 12 May '04

12 May '04

Bugs item #14, was opened at 2004-05-12 17:10 You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=14&group_id=5 Category: cxx-grammar Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Olivier Gournet (gourne_o) Assigned to: Clement Vasseur (vasseu_c) Summary: Operator && Initial Comment: Operator '&&' mysteriously fail, operator '||' or 'and' work fine. Code example: --- int i = 1 && 1; --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=14&group_id=5

1 0

[ transformers-Bugs-13 ] Operator &&
by noreply＠gforge.lrde.epita.fr 12 May '04

12 May '04

Bugs item #13, was opened at 2004-05-12 17:06 You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=13&group_id=5 Category: cxx-grammar Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Olivier Gournet (gourne_o) Assigned to: Clement Vasseur (vasseu_c) Summary: Operator && Initial Comment: Operator '&&' mysteriously fail, operator '||' or 'and' work fine. Code example: --- int i = 1 && 1; --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=13&group_id=5

1 0

[ transformers-Bugs-12 ] standard input with parse-cxx
by noreply＠gforge.lrde.epita.fr 10 May '04

10 May '04

Bugs item #12, was opened at 10/05/2004 18:07 You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=12&group_id=5 Category: cxx-grammar Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Valentin David (david_v) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: standard input with parse-cxx Initial Comment: parse-cxx seems to not work at all when the "-i" option is skipped. It should normally take the standard input as input. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=12&group_id=5

1 0

[ transformers-Bugs-5 ] make distcheck failure
by noreply＠gforge.lrde.epita.fr 06 May '04

06 May '04

Bugs item #5, was opened at 2004-05-06 16:48 You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=5&group_id=5 Category: sdf-astgen Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Clement Vasseur (vasseu_c) Assigned to: Nicolas Pouillard (pouill_n) Summary: make distcheck failure Initial Comment: Making all in syn make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/auto_build/src/sdf-astgen/sdf-astgen-0.1/_build/src/syn' /tmp/auto_build/usr/strategoxt/bin/pack-sdf -I ../../../lib/sdf-pgen -I /tmp/auto_build/usr/strategoxt/share/sdf/sdf-front -I /tmp/auto_build/usr/strategoxt/share/sdf/stratego-front -i ../../../src/syn/Stratego-Stratego-AstSdf2.sdf -o Stratego-Stratego-AstSdf2.def ** ERROR: Module Stratego-AstSdf2 not found make[3]: *** [Stratego-Stratego-AstSdf2.def] Error 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=5&group_id=5

1 0

Re: [Transformers-bugs] [ transformers-Bugs-2 ] cxx-typecheck does not compile
by Akim Demaille 06 May '04

06 May '04

>>> <noreply(a)gforge.lrde.epita.fr> writes: > Bugs item #2, was opened at 2004-05-05 17:18 > You can respond by visiting: > http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=2&group_id=5 Youhoo !

1 0

[ transformers-Bugs-2 ] cxx-typecheck does not compile
by noreply＠gforge.lrde.epita.fr 05 May '04

05 May '04

Bugs item #2, was opened at 2004-05-05 17:18 You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=2&group_id=5 Category: cxx-typecheck Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: Clement Vasseur (vasseu_c) Assigned to: Julien Roussel (rousse_l) Summary: cxx-typecheck does not compile Initial Comment: Making all in config make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/auto_build/src/cxx-typecheck/config' make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/auto_build/src/cxx-typecheck/config' Making all in src make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/auto_build/src/cxx-typecheck/src' Making all in syn make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/auto_build/src/cxx-typecheck/src/syn' /tmp/auto_build/usr/esdf/bin/pack-esdf -s BoxedSdf2 -of ast -I /tmp/auto_build/usr/cxx-grammar/share/sdf/cxx-grammar -I ../../src/syn -i ../../src/syn/TypedCxx.sdf | /tmp/auto_build/usr/sdf-option/bin/sdf-option | /tmp/auto_build/usr/strategoxt/bin/sdf-cons -o TypedCxx.ppdef.af No XTC registration for BoxedSdf2.tbl found ** ERROR: Module ../../src/syn/TypedCxx.sdf not found readFromTextFile: parse error at line 0, col 0 not a valid term /tmp/auto_build/usr/sdf-option/bin/sdf-option: rewriting failed readFromTextFile: parse error at line 0, col 0 not a valid term /tmp/auto_build/usr/strategoxt/bin/sdf-cons: rewriting failed make[2]: *** [TypedCxx.ppdef.af] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/auto_build/src/cxx-typecheck/src/syn' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/auto_build/src/cxx-typecheck/src' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=2&group_id=5

1 0

[ transformers-Bugs-1 ] specs-grammar does not compile
by noreply＠gforge.lrde.epita.fr 05 May '04

05 May '04

Bugs item #1, was opened at 2004-05-05 17:17 You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=1&group_id=5 Category: specs-grammar Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: Clement Vasseur (vasseu_c) Assigned to: Nicolas Pouillard (pouill_n) Summary: specs-grammar does not compile Initial Comment: Making all in config make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/auto_build/src/specs-grammar/config' make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/auto_build/src/specs-grammar/config' Making all in src make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/auto_build/src/specs-grammar/src' Making all in syn make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/auto_build/src/specs-grammar/src/syn' /tmp/auto_build/usr/esdf/bin/pack-esdf -s BoxedSdf2 -of ast -I ../../lib -I ../../src/syn -i ../../src/syn/SPECS.sdf | /tmp/auto_build/usr/sdf-option/bin/sdf-option | /tmp/auto_build/usr/strategoxt/bin/sdf-cons -o SPECS.ppdef.af No XTC registration for BoxedSdf2.tbl found ** ERROR: Module ../../src/syn/SPECS.sdf not found readFromTextFile: parse error at line 0, col 0 not a valid term /tmp/auto_build/usr/sdf-option/bin/sdf-option: rewriting failed readFromTextFile: parse error at line 0, col 0 not a valid term /tmp/auto_build/usr/strategoxt/bin/sdf-cons: rewriting failed make[2]: *** [SPECS.ppdef.af] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/auto_build/src/specs-grammar/src/syn' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/auto_build/src/specs-grammar/src' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=1&group_id=5

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Transformers-bugs May 2004