5 Jun
2006
5 Jun
'06
10:42 a.m.
>> "SIGOURE" == SIGOURE Benoit
<sigoure.benoit(a)lrde.epita.fr> writes:
+ %% ExpressionFunc ::=
+ %% (* older builtin functions for backwards compat. *)
+ %% "rand" "(" Expression {"," Expression}
")"
+ %% (* builtin functions calls using the "func" notation *)
+ %% | "func" "(" "rand" ","
Expression {"," Expression} ")"
What do you mean by "older"?
Why did you choose to also include the "func" feature?
Why did you choose the name of the functions to be defined in the
grammar?
5 Jun
5 Jun
2:47 p.m.
New subject: XRM 41: Add the rand() builtin.
Akim Demaille <akim(a)lrde.epita.fr> writes:
PRISM defines different ways to call a built-in function ; IIRC, we
should now use « func (builtin, param, param) », albeit, for backward
compatibility, « builtin (param, param) » is kept.
--
| Isn't vi that text editor with Michaël `Micha' Cadilhac |
| two modes... One that beeps and cadilh_m - Epita 2007 - CSI |
| one that corrupts your file? JID: micha(a)amessage.be |
`-- - - -- Dan Jacobson - - --'
>>
"SIGOURE" == SIGOURE Benoit <sigoure.benoit(a)lrde.epita.fr> writes:
+ %% ExpressionFunc ::=
+ %% (* older builtin functions for backwards compat. *)
+ %% "rand" "(" Expression {"," Expression}
")"
+ %% (* builtin functions calls using the "func" notation *)
+ %% | "func" "(" "rand" ","
Expression {"," Expression} ")"
What do you mean by "older"?
Why did you choose to also include the "func" feature?
5:42 p.m.
New subject: XRM 41: Add the rand() builtin.
>> "Michaël" == Michaël Cadilhac
<michael.cadilhac(a)lrde.org> writes:
Akim Demaille <akim(a)lrde.epita.fr> writes:
>>>> "SIGOURE" == SIGOURE Benoit
<sigoure.benoit(a)lrde.epita.fr> writes:
>
> > + %% ExpressionFunc ::=
> > + %% (* older builtin functions for backwards compat. *)
> > + %% "rand" "(" Expression {","
Expression} ")"
> > + %% (* builtin functions calls using the "func" notation
*)
> > + %% | "func" "(" "rand" ","
Expression {"," Expression} ")"
>
> What do you mean by "older"?
> Why did you choose to also include the "func" feature?
PRISM defines different ways to call a built-in
function ; IIRC, we
should now use « func (builtin, param, param) », albeit, for backward
compatibility, « builtin (param, param) » is kept.
Any rationale?
6:04 p.m.
New subject: XRM 41: Add the rand() builtin.
Akim Demaille <akim(a)lrde.epita.fr> writes:
Esoteric programming languages aren't reasonable.
--
| Pour les 35-40 ans, l'humour Michaël `Micha' Cadilhac |
| c'est une plus-value. cadilh_m - Epita 2007 - CSI |
| -- Guillaume L. JID: micha(a)amessage.be |
`-- - - - - --'
>>
"Michaël" == Michaël Cadilhac <michael.cadilhac(a)lrde.org> writes:
Akim Demaille <akim(a)lrde.epita.fr> writes:
>>>> "SIGOURE" == SIGOURE Benoit
<sigoure.benoit(a)lrde.epita.fr> writes:
>
> > + %% ExpressionFunc ::=
> > + %% (* older builtin functions for backwards compat. *)
> > + %% "rand" "(" Expression {","
Expression} ")"
> > + %% (* builtin functions calls using the "func" notation
*)
> > + %% | "func" "(" "rand" ","
Expression {"," Expression} ")"
>
> What do you mean by "older"?
> Why did you choose to also include the "func" feature?
PRISM defines different ways to call a built-in
function ; IIRC, we
should now use « func (builtin, param, param) », albeit, for backward
compatibility, « builtin (param, param) » is kept.
Any rationale?
6795
days inactive
6795
days old
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Akim Demaille -
michael.cadilhac＠lrde.org