30 May
2006
30 May
'06
5:22 p.m.
>> "SIGOURE" == SIGOURE Benoit
<sigoure.benoit(a)lrde.epita.fr> writes:
Simplify XRM's grammar.
The constructors for meta for loops and meta ifs had each two
different names depending whether they were found at top-level or
inside modules. This turned out to be a bad idea because it was
completely unecessary and made transformations harder (because
multiple different cases had to be addressed where a single one could
be enough).
From now on we also stop saying "static" for loops or "static" if
because "meta" seems more appropriate to qualify them and it sounds
better (buzzword inside! :P)
Good.
+ // -> MetaFor
prism-to-box:
- OuterStaticFor(idf, for-from, for-to, mfs-list)
+ MetaFor(idf, for-from, for-to, mfs-list)
Pourquoi ne pas reposer sur GPP ?