30 Jun
2006
30 Jun
'06
1:32 p.m.
On 2006-06-29, Akim Demaille <akim(a)lrde.epita.fr> wrote:
I don't know, strc seems to have many different level of optimizations (from
-O 0 through -O 6) but I always used -O 2.
Maybe this case is optimized with a higher -O level...
--
SIGOURE Benoit aka Tsuna
_____
/EPITA\ Promo 2008.CSI Rock & tRoll
>>
"Tsuna" == Tsuna <tsuna(a)warszawa.lrde.epita.fr> writes:
On 2006-06-23, Akim Demaille
<akim(a)lrde.epita.fr> wrote:
>>>> "SIGOURE" == SIGOURE Benoit
<sigoure.benoit(a)lrde.epita.fr> writes:
>
> > - ; (?i, ?decimals) // i="42", decimals="000000"
> > + ; ?(i, decimals) // i="42", decimals="000000"
>
> Mere optimization, or more mandatory?
It's a simple optimization.
Am I missing something, or else, shouldn't strc optimize this by
itself? I agree the latter is nicer anyway, but that's not the
point.