21 Sep
2004
21 Sep
'04
8:34 p.m.
Akim Demaille <akim(a)epita.fr> writes:
I would like to have Tasks portable to other projects,
so I'm
interested in knowing if there are actual differences.
The main true difference between TC's and Nolimips' tasks systems is
that TC's relies on argp (using char*) whereas Nolimips uses its own
command line parser (autonomous, implemented with std::string).
... You will respond me that the Task system might benefit from argp's
subparsers :) (Damn! :)
While talking about the tasks: I am planning to move each
\(.*\)-tasks.* files from their directories to the source root, to
make each module/library... ah... "pure" (no!! don't kill me, Yann! :)
What do you think about that? Do you see anything against it?
--
Noe