I propose the removal of the eh/cleanup1 test. This one depends on a patched version of SGLR, it is huge and takes a lot of time to run, and best of all it randomly fails. See bug #37 on gforge: "This test always fail, but never at the same place." It prevents the auto-build system to install cxx-grammar and test the packages that depends on it. Very annoying. Any objection? -- Clement Vasseur -o) [ nitro :: EPITA CSI 2005 ] /\\ "Programming is about being lazy." _\_V
"Clement" == Clement Vasseur <nitro@epita.fr> writes:
I propose the removal of the eh/cleanup1 test. This one depends on a patched version of SGLR, it is huge and takes a lot of time to run, and best of all it randomly fails. See bug #37 on gforge: "This test always fail, but never at the same place."
It prevents the auto-build system to install cxx-grammar and test the packages that depends on it. Very annoying.
Any objection?
Please, keep it there, but disable its execution. Drop a huge note explaining the problem.
Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr> wrote
"Clement" == Clement Vasseur <nitro@epita.fr> writes:
I propose the removal of the eh/cleanup1 test. This one depends on a patched version of SGLR, it is huge and takes a lot of time to run, and best of all it randomly fails. See bug #37 on gforge: "This test always fail, but never at the same place."
It prevents the auto-build system to install cxx-grammar and test the packages that depends on it. Very annoying.
Any objection?
Please, keep it there, but disable its execution. Drop a huge note explaining the problem.
Since the test works fine everywhere except on Sandrock, I dropped Sandrock instead of dropping the test. -- Clement Vasseur -o) [ nitro :: EPITA CSI 2005 ] /\\ "Programming is about being lazy." _\_V
participants (2)
-
Akim Demaille -
Clement Vasseur