[Transformers] Re: Bug in C++ syntax.

This legal code : === struct A { typedef int B; }; typedef A C; C::B i; ===

is not supported by the standard grammar.

Je comprends pas : tu dis "legal" et "not supported by the standard grammar". Pourtant pour moi c'est équivalent, non ?

"C::" is a nested-name-specifier and then "C" a class-or-namespace-name. But here, it is a typedef name !

I think the grammar should be this :

class-or-namespace-name: class-name namespace-name typedef-name