Bugs item #19, was opened at 2004-05-14 15:45 You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=19&group_id=5 Category: cxx-grammar Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 4 Submitted By: Olivier Gournet (gourne_o) Assigned to: Clement Vasseur (vasseu_c) Summary: For statement Initial Comment: The grammar is now correct for 'for statement', but it introduced an additional unresolved ambiguity. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=19&group_id=5