- Transformers-bugs

*****SPAM***** Re : Can you please me
by Young Chung 25 Mar '05

25 Mar '05

Spam detection software, running on the system "kualalumpur.lrde.epita.fr", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: http://practical.myabsinth.com/dc3r.html http://highland.myabsinth.com/nothanks.php oaken brittanyadvantage leroy calfskintiny gyroscope inductteaspoonful agrimony flashbackcraftsperson sean burpale electrode frazierelephant crispin barricadeblockade trigonometry calumnyconfuse gilmore morrissuperannuate [...] Content analysis details: (19.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 2.1 BAYES_80 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 80 to 95% [score: 0.8805] 3.0 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08 BODY: HTML: images with 400-800 bytes of words 0.1 MPART_ALT_DIFF BODY: HTML and text parts are different 0.1 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 BODY: Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 0.1 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML 1.5 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 1.0 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist [URIs: myabsinth.com] 1.5 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist [URIs: myabsinth.com] 3.2 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the OB SURBL blocklist [URIs: myabsinth.com] 4.3 URIBL_SC_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the SC SURBL blocklist [URIs: myabsinth.com] 2.3 LONGWORDS Long string of long words The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.

1 0

*****SPAM***** YOur rOommate's spying 0n you
by Deloris Numbers 25 Mar '05

25 Mar '05

Spam detection software, running on the system "kualalumpur.lrde.epita.fr", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Meanwhile an informal cease-fire between Indonesian troops and rebels appeared to have collapsed, threatening to derail relief efforts remOve Meanwhile an informal cease-fire between Indonesian troops and rebels appeared to have collapsed, threatening to derail relief efforts [...] Content analysis details: (23.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.3 UNIQUE_WORDS BODY: Message body has many words used only once 0.0 HTML_30_40 BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5800] 0.1 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 BODY: Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 1.5 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP RBL: SORBS: sender is open HTTP proxy server [221.116.50.252 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.4 RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY RBL: NJABL: sender is an open proxy [221.116.50.252 listed in combined.njabl.org] 0.3 RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC RBL: SORBS: sender is open proxy server [221.116.50.252 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 3.1 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL [221.116.50.252 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is a abuseable web server [221.116.50.252 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 3.8 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org [<http://dsbl.org/listing?221.116.50.252>] 1.0 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist [URIs: spybanner.info] 1.5 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist [URIs: spybanner.info] 3.2 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the OB SURBL blocklist [URIs: spybanner.info] 4.3 URIBL_SC_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the SC SURBL blocklist [URIs: spybanner.info] 2.3 LONGWORDS Long string of long words The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.

1 0

*****SPAM***** Otc review ana|ysts pick
by Katherine Martinez 24 Mar '05

24 Mar '05

Spam detection software, running on the system "kualalumpur.lrde.epita.fr", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Montana Oil and Gas, Inc.(MOGI) To Exp|ore further opportunities in Alberta Canada, is an energy developer in Canada's most high|y coveted reservoirs. Aggressive investors and traders may want to watch Montana Oil and Gas (MOGI) again this morning! Montana 0i| and Gas Inc. (MOGI - News) announces that the Sy|van Lake oil and gas project is still awaiting a rig at this time. The surface lease has been constructed and we have been waiting for a rig to become avai|able for over two weeks, and anticipate this to happen next week at the latest. [...] Content analysis details: (8.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.9 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100% [score: 1.0000] 2.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address [81.136.168.208 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?81.136.168.208>] 3.1 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL [81.136.168.208 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]

1 0

pack-esdf: error: file ./D.sdf does not exist
by Akim Demaille 22 Feb '05

22 Feb '05

make[3]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/c-grammar/src/gnusyn' Making all in deterministic make[3]: Entering directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/c-grammar/src/deterministic' /home/akim/src/transformers/_build/tmpdist//usr/local/bin/pack-esdf \ -s AttrSdf \ -of ast \ -I /home/akim/src/transformers/_build/tmpdist//usr/local/share/sdf-detgen\ -I /home/akim/src/transformers/_build/tmpdist//usr/local/share/sdf-attribute \ -I ../../../../c-grammar/lib \ -Idef ../../src/syn/C.edef \ -I ../../src/deterministic \ -I ../../../../c-grammar/src/deterministic \ -i D.sdf -o D.edef.af pack-sdf: warning: directory specified with -I does not exist: ../../../../c-grammar/lib pack-esdf: error: file ./D.sdf does not exist make[3]: *** [D.edef.af] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/c-grammar/src/deterministic' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/c-grammar/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/c-grammar' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build'

1 0

Recursive dependencies
by Akim Demaille 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

When you run make twice, the second time there are still some compilations performed. In fact, it never pacifies, which is a PITA. One issue is the following. In sdf-detgen/src/syn/Makefile.am, we have: DetBoxedSdf.def: $(BUNDLED_BOXEDSDF)/share/boxedsdf/BoxedSdf2.def and BoxedSdf2.def is built in boxedsdf/src/syn/Makefile.am (which is processed earlier, so this is a good point). But the recursive invocation of all the sub packages implies an installation: that's what tell Makefile.am: | $(RECURSIVE_TARGETS): | @$(mkinstalldirs) $(TMPDIST) | @set fnord $$MAKEFLAGS; amf=$$2; \ | dot_seen=no; \ | target=`echo $@ | sed s/-recursive//`; \ | list='$(SUBDIRS)'; for subdir in $$list; do \ | echo "Making $$target in $$subdir"; \ | if test "$$subdir" = "."; then \ | dot_seen=yes; \ | local_target="$$target-am"; \ | else \ | local_target="$$target"; \ | fi; \ | (cd $$subdir && \ | $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) $$local_target) \ | || case "$$amf" in *=*) exit 1;; *k*) fail=yes;; *) exit 1;; esac; \ | inpreinstpkgs=false; \ | for i in $(PREINST_PKGS); do \ | test x"$$i" = x"$$subdir" && inpreinstpkgs=true; \ | done; \ | innopreinst=false; \ | for i in $(NO_PREINST); do \ | test x"$$i" = x"$$target" && innopreinst=true; \ | done; \ | if test $$inpreinstpkgs = true \ | && test $$innopreinst = false; then \ | (cd $$subdir && \ ===>>| $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) DESTDIR=$(TMPDIST) install) \ | || case "$$amf" in *=*) exit 1;; *k*) fail=yes;; *) exit 1;; \ | esac; \ | fi \ | done; \ | if test "$$dot_seen" = "no"; then \ | $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) "$$target-am" || exit 1; \ | fi; test -z "$$fail" This piece of code, when going into boxedsdf will install BoxedSdf2.def again, and then we're good for another set of useless compilation. 1. Do we really really need to preinstall things like this? 2. If we do, wouldn't it be better to install lazily: only if $cmp reports the files are different, so as to keep timestamps happy. This means using another install program...

2 1

./Dxx.sdf does not exist
by Akim Demaille 15 Feb '05

15 Feb '05

Making all in deterministic make[3]: Entering directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/cxx-grammar/src/deterministic' cd ../../../../cxx-grammar && /home/akim/src/transformers/_build/envshell /work/akim/src/transformers/cxx-grammar/config/missing --run automake-1.9a --gnu src/deterministic/Makefile cd ../.. && /home/akim/src/transformers/_build/envshell ./config.status src/deterministic/Makefile config.status: creating src/deterministic/Makefile make[3]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/cxx-grammar/src/deterministic' make[3]: Entering directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/cxx-grammar/src/deterministic' /home/akim/src/transformers/_build/tmpdist//usr/local/bin/det-gen \ -b "<%>" -e "</%>" -m Cxx -i ../../src/syn/Cxx.edef -o DetCxx.sdf /home/akim/src/transformers/_build/tmpdist//usr/local/bin/pack-esdf \ -s DetBoxedSdf \ -of ast \ -I /home/akim/src/transformers/_build/tmpdist//usr/local/share/sdf-detgen \ -I ../../../../cxx-grammar/lib \ -Idef ../../src/syn/Cxx.def \ -I ../../src/deterministic \ -I ../../../../cxx-grammar/src/deterministic \ -i Dxx.sdf -o Dxx.edef.af pack-esdf: error: file ./Dxx.sdf does not exist make[3]: *** [Dxx.edef.af] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/cxx-grammar/src/deterministic' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/cxx-grammar/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/cxx-grammar' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build'

2 1

*****SPAM***** Re: Can you please me
by Marcy Payton 15 Feb '05

15 Feb '05

Spam detection software, running on the system "kualalumpur.lrde.epita.fr", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Goodbye breezy inclinebillboard vexation angussomewhere hornet dessertarbiter humanoid comptondostoevsky housebreak guaranteeconvertible snob politicpompous louver smotherwrapup va satiateroyalty darlene gallhomotopy [...] Content analysis details: (22.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.2 INVALID_TZ_GMT Invalid date in header (wrong GMT/UTC timezone) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 2.1 BAYES_80 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 80 to 95% [score: 0.9186] 3.0 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08 BODY: HTML: images with 400-800 bytes of words 0.2 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 0.1 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?216.212.95.82>] 3.1 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL [216.212.95.82 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org] 1.0 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist [URIs: strippppnow.com] 1.5 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist [URIs: strippppnow.com] 3.2 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the OB SURBL blocklist [URIs: strippppnow.com] 4.3 URIBL_SC_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the SC SURBL blocklist [URIs: strippppnow.com] 0.1 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag 2.3 LONGWORDS Long string of long words The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.

1 0

attr-lib
by Akim Demaille 14 Feb '05

14 Feb '05

A "make" from the top level leads to... make[3]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/sdf-attribute/src/evaluate' Making all in disamb make[3]: Entering directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/sdf-attribute/src/disamb' /home/lrde/admin/lrde/usr/stratego_beta/bin/strc -I ../../../../sdf-attribute/src/attributed-trees -I ../../src/syn -I ../../src/lib --main attr-disamb --verbose 0 -i ../../../../sdf-attribute/src/disamb/attr-disamb.str -o attr-disamb.c -c *** module attr-lib not found compilation failed (0.24 secs) make[3]: *** [attr-disamb.c] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/sdf-attribute/src/disamb' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/sdf-attribute/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/sdf-attribute' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1

2 1

*****SPAM*****
by Finnzvc＠home.ro 09 Feb '05

09 Feb '05

Spam detection software, running on the system "kualalumpur.lrde.epita.fr", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: [...] Content analysis details: (11.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name 0.1 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header 1.9 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100% [score: 0.9981] 0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP RBL: SORBS: sender is open HTTP proxy server [62.23.232.69 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.4 RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY RBL: NJABL: sender is an open proxy [62.23.232.69 listed in combined.njabl.org] 3.1 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL [62.23.232.69 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org] 3.8 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org [<http://dsbl.org/listing?62.23.232.69>] 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?62.23.232.69>] 1.2 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.1 MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER Message-Id was added by a relay

1 0

[ transformers-Bugs-50 ] external redefinitions
by noreply＠lrde.epita.fr 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

Bugs item #50, was opened at 13/01/2005 15:10 You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=50&group_id=5 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 4 Submitted By: Valentin David (david_v) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: external redefinitions Initial Comment: Since rev 8209 (0.13pre) of StrategoXT, it checks for external redifinitions. short-definition(1,0) and long-definition(1,0) are defined in the SSL but must be redefined in the user program. But it will not compile with library dynamic linking. These strategies are deprecated. We must now use io-wrap(4,0). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://gforge.lrde.epita.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101&aid=50&group_id=5

1 0