February 2005 - Transformers-bugs

pack-esdf: error: file ./D.sdf does not exist
by Akim Demaille 22 Feb '05

22 Feb '05

make[3]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/c-grammar/src/gnusyn' Making all in deterministic make[3]: Entering directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/c-grammar/src/deterministic' /home/akim/src/transformers/_build/tmpdist//usr/local/bin/pack-esdf \ -s AttrSdf \ -of ast \ -I /home/akim/src/transformers/_build/tmpdist//usr/local/share/sdf-detgen\ -I /home/akim/src/transformers/_build/tmpdist//usr/local/share/sdf-attribute \ -I ../../../../c-grammar/lib \ -Idef ../../src/syn/C.edef \ -I ../../src/deterministic \ -I ../../../../c-grammar/src/deterministic \ -i D.sdf -o D.edef.af pack-sdf: warning: directory specified with -I does not exist: ../../../../c-grammar/lib pack-esdf: error: file ./D.sdf does not exist make[3]: *** [D.edef.af] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/c-grammar/src/deterministic' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/c-grammar/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/c-grammar' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build'

1 0

Recursive dependencies
by Akim Demaille 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

When you run make twice, the second time there are still some compilations performed. In fact, it never pacifies, which is a PITA. One issue is the following. In sdf-detgen/src/syn/Makefile.am, we have: DetBoxedSdf.def: $(BUNDLED_BOXEDSDF)/share/boxedsdf/BoxedSdf2.def and BoxedSdf2.def is built in boxedsdf/src/syn/Makefile.am (which is processed earlier, so this is a good point). But the recursive invocation of all the sub packages implies an installation: that's what tell Makefile.am: | $(RECURSIVE_TARGETS): | @$(mkinstalldirs) $(TMPDIST) | @set fnord $$MAKEFLAGS; amf=$$2; \ | dot_seen=no; \ | target=`echo $@ | sed s/-recursive//`; \ | list='$(SUBDIRS)'; for subdir in $$list; do \ | echo "Making $$target in $$subdir"; \ | if test "$$subdir" = "."; then \ | dot_seen=yes; \ | local_target="$$target-am"; \ | else \ | local_target="$$target"; \ | fi; \ | (cd $$subdir && \ | $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) $$local_target) \ | || case "$$amf" in *=*) exit 1;; *k*) fail=yes;; *) exit 1;; esac; \ | inpreinstpkgs=false; \ | for i in $(PREINST_PKGS); do \ | test x"$$i" = x"$$subdir" && inpreinstpkgs=true; \ | done; \ | innopreinst=false; \ | for i in $(NO_PREINST); do \ | test x"$$i" = x"$$target" && innopreinst=true; \ | done; \ | if test $$inpreinstpkgs = true \ | && test $$innopreinst = false; then \ | (cd $$subdir && \ ===>>| $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) DESTDIR=$(TMPDIST) install) \ | || case "$$amf" in *=*) exit 1;; *k*) fail=yes;; *) exit 1;; \ | esac; \ | fi \ | done; \ | if test "$$dot_seen" = "no"; then \ | $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) "$$target-am" || exit 1; \ | fi; test -z "$$fail" This piece of code, when going into boxedsdf will install BoxedSdf2.def again, and then we're good for another set of useless compilation. 1. Do we really really need to preinstall things like this? 2. If we do, wouldn't it be better to install lazily: only if $cmp reports the files are different, so as to keep timestamps happy. This means using another install program...

2 1

./Dxx.sdf does not exist
by Akim Demaille 15 Feb '05

15 Feb '05

Making all in deterministic make[3]: Entering directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/cxx-grammar/src/deterministic' cd ../../../../cxx-grammar && /home/akim/src/transformers/_build/envshell /work/akim/src/transformers/cxx-grammar/config/missing --run automake-1.9a --gnu src/deterministic/Makefile cd ../.. && /home/akim/src/transformers/_build/envshell ./config.status src/deterministic/Makefile config.status: creating src/deterministic/Makefile make[3]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/cxx-grammar/src/deterministic' make[3]: Entering directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/cxx-grammar/src/deterministic' /home/akim/src/transformers/_build/tmpdist//usr/local/bin/det-gen \ -b "<%>" -e "</%>" -m Cxx -i ../../src/syn/Cxx.edef -o DetCxx.sdf /home/akim/src/transformers/_build/tmpdist//usr/local/bin/pack-esdf \ -s DetBoxedSdf \ -of ast \ -I /home/akim/src/transformers/_build/tmpdist//usr/local/share/sdf-detgen \ -I ../../../../cxx-grammar/lib \ -Idef ../../src/syn/Cxx.def \ -I ../../src/deterministic \ -I ../../../../cxx-grammar/src/deterministic \ -i Dxx.sdf -o Dxx.edef.af pack-esdf: error: file ./Dxx.sdf does not exist make[3]: *** [Dxx.edef.af] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/cxx-grammar/src/deterministic' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/cxx-grammar/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/cxx-grammar' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build'

2 1

*****SPAM***** Re: Can you please me
by Marcy Payton 15 Feb '05

15 Feb '05

Spam detection software, running on the system "kualalumpur.lrde.epita.fr", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Goodbye breezy inclinebillboard vexation angussomewhere hornet dessertarbiter humanoid comptondostoevsky housebreak guaranteeconvertible snob politicpompous louver smotherwrapup va satiateroyalty darlene gallhomotopy [...] Content analysis details: (22.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.2 INVALID_TZ_GMT Invalid date in header (wrong GMT/UTC timezone) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 2.1 BAYES_80 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 80 to 95% [score: 0.9186] 3.0 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08 BODY: HTML: images with 400-800 bytes of words 0.2 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 0.1 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?216.212.95.82>] 3.1 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL [216.212.95.82 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org] 1.0 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist [URIs: strippppnow.com] 1.5 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist [URIs: strippppnow.com] 3.2 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the OB SURBL blocklist [URIs: strippppnow.com] 4.3 URIBL_SC_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the SC SURBL blocklist [URIs: strippppnow.com] 0.1 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag 2.3 LONGWORDS Long string of long words The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.

1 0

attr-lib
by Akim Demaille 14 Feb '05

14 Feb '05

A "make" from the top level leads to... make[3]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/sdf-attribute/src/evaluate' Making all in disamb make[3]: Entering directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/sdf-attribute/src/disamb' /home/lrde/admin/lrde/usr/stratego_beta/bin/strc -I ../../../../sdf-attribute/src/attributed-trees -I ../../src/syn -I ../../src/lib --main attr-disamb --verbose 0 -i ../../../../sdf-attribute/src/disamb/attr-disamb.str -o attr-disamb.c -c *** module attr-lib not found compilation failed (0.24 secs) make[3]: *** [attr-disamb.c] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/sdf-attribute/src/disamb' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/sdf-attribute/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/work/akim/src/transformers/_build/sdf-attribute' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1

2 1

*****SPAM*****
by Finnzvc＠home.ro 09 Feb '05

09 Feb '05

Spam detection software, running on the system "kualalumpur.lrde.epita.fr", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: [...] Content analysis details: (11.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name 0.1 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header 1.9 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100% [score: 0.9981] 0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP RBL: SORBS: sender is open HTTP proxy server [62.23.232.69 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.4 RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY RBL: NJABL: sender is an open proxy [62.23.232.69 listed in combined.njabl.org] 3.1 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL [62.23.232.69 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org] 3.8 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org [<http://dsbl.org/listing?62.23.232.69>] 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?62.23.232.69>] 1.2 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.1 MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER Message-Id was added by a relay

1 0