#3: Migrate Olena 0.11 (and previous revisions) from PRCS to Subversion --------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: levill_r | Owner: levill_r Type: enhancement | Status: assigned Priority: blocker | Milestone: Olena 0.11.1 Component: other | Version: 0.11 Resolution: | Keywords: prcs subversion svn --------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Comment (by anonymous): default as a design pattern rather than trying to put it all together. That way you can never create offline or print docs of high quality without again having the devs or current admins maintain the comments and annotations. Hopefully a small Wiki quality team will evolve (i am against ops or admins) to review and summarize the contributions. I hope this gives us more users as contributors than having the docs focused on the devs. Cheers, duns [http://www.about-china.net.cn/wrought-iron/cat_4.html china tour] [http://www.about-china.net.cn/wrought-iron/cat_3.html Apparel] [http://www.about-china.net.cn/wrought-iron/cat_5.html shoes] [http://www.about-china.net.cn/wrought-iron/cat_12.html bags] [http://www .about-china.net.cn/wrought-iron/cat_6.html Kitchen] [http://www.about- china.net.cn/wrought-iron/cat_7.html Food and Wine] [http://www.about- china.net.cn/wrought-iron/cat_8.html Furniture)] [http://www.about- china.net.cn/wrought-iron/cat_9.html Flowers and Gifts] [http://www.about- china.net.cn/wrought-iron/cat_10.html Wall Art] [http://www.about- china.net.cn/wrought-iron/cat_11.html Computer Components] I still prefer a wiki like approach since the php (or mysql) docs are very cluttered when you have to take their comments in account. On the other hand they are professionally maintained imho, since they are *much* better than KDE documentation. KDE is by far larger and has so many different apps, which need screenshots and end user not dev/api docs, that more help is needed as long as the devs prefer to code than to write nice docs. And it is their choice to some degree imo. Technically interested but non-dev end users, which are plenty out there, are the users of and the best contributers to the docs -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.lrde.org/olena/ticket/3#comment:6> Olena <http://olena.lrde.epita.fr> Olena, a generic and efficient C++ image processing library.