#201: Use « olena » instead of « oln » as an identifier -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- Reporter: levill_r | Owner: Olena Team Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Olena | Version: 1.0 Resolution: | Keywords: -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- Old description:

We should no longer use « `oln` » ; « `olena` » is much more clearer.

* The Subversion repository is called `oln`, because `olena` was already used (arg!); we should not do this mistake again: the future Git repository shall be named `olena`. * Likewise, Olena's build farm URL (https://buildfarm.lrde.org/buildfarm/oln/) should be renamed to `olena`.

If you find some other places where the project is called `oln` instead of `olena`, please report them here. TIA.

New description: We should no longer use « `oln` » ; « `olena` » is much more clearer. * ~~The Subversion repository is called `oln`, because `olena` was already used (arg!); we should not do this mistake again: the future Git repository shall be named `olena`~~ (done). * Likewise, Olena's build farm URL (https://buildfarm.lrde.org/buildfarm/oln/) should be renamed to `olena`. If you find some other places where the project is called `oln` instead of `olena`, please report them here. TIA. -- Comment(by levill_r): Update the status of this ticket (migration to Git). BTW, I (Roland) tried to rename the buildfarm from `oln` to `olena`, but I failed. There are many things to change, including in the Apache configuration of the !BuildBot masters. I've left the buildfarm as-is for the moment. I'll try again later. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.lrde.org/olena/ticket/201#comment:1> Olena <http://olena.lrde.epita.fr> Olena, a generic and efficient C++ image processing library.