Roland Levillain <roland@lrde.epita.fr> writes:
Thierry GERAUD <theo@lrde.epita.fr> writes:
Index: oln/core/abstract/image.hh =================================================================== --- oln/core/abstract/image.hh (revision 526) +++ oln/core/abstract/image.hh (working copy) @@ -29,216 +29,11 @@
[...]
+ /// Typedefs. + typedef oln_type_of(E, topo) topo_t; + typedef oln_type_of(E, psite) psite_t; + typedef oln_type_of(E, rvalue) rvalue_t;
Shouldn't we use type names ending in `_type', rather than `_t', in accordance with
https://olena.lrde.epita.fr/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Olena/CodingStyle
?
We've discussed this point with Théo; he said names ending in `_type' are for public types, while the ones ending in `_t' are for private types. That makes sense to me, so I suggest sticking to this convention. (BTW, we have to create a new coding style for Olena 1.0 on the Wiki, derived from Olena 0.10's.)