#163: Decide how « mln_?iter(T) » macros should expand -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- Reporter: levill_r | Owner: Olena Team Type: proposal | Status: new Priority: critical | Milestone: Olena 1.0 Component: Milena | Version: 1.0 Resolution: | Keywords: convention shortcut -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- Changes (by levill_r): * priority: minor => critical Old description:
In source:trunk/milena/mln/core/macros.hh, the macros
{{{ #!cpp mln_?iter(T) mln_?iter_(T) }}}
expand as
{{{ #!cpp typename T::fwd_?iter T::fwd_?iter }}}
Shouldn't they expand as
{{{ #!cpp typename T::?iter T::?iter }}}
?
If so, we should define `?iter` `typedefs` (defaulting to `fwd_?iter`) in relevant classes.
New description: In source:trunk/milena/mln/core/macros.hh, the macros {{{ #!cpp mln_?iter(T) mln_?iter_(T) }}} expand as {{{ #!cpp typename T::fwd_?iter T::fwd_?iter }}} Shouldn't they expand as {{{ #!cpp typename T::?iter T::?iter }}} ? This concerns (as of r3853) the following macros: {{{ #!cpp define mln_qiter(T) typename T::fwd_qiter define mln_qiter_(T) T::fwd_qiter define mln_niter(T) typename T::fwd_niter define mln_niter_(T) T::fwd_niter define mln_viter(T) typename T::fwd_viter define mln_viter_(T) T::fwd_viter }}} If so, we should define `?iter` `typedefs` (defaulting to `fwd_?iter`) in relevant classes. -- -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.lrde.org/olena/ticket/163#comment:2> Olena <http://olena.lrde.epita.fr> Olena, a generic and efficient C++ image processing library.