#135: Have util::vertex and util::edge be distinct types ------------------------+--------------------------------------------------- Reporter: garrigues | Owner: levill_r Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: Olena 1.0 Component: Milena | Version: 1.0 Resolution: | Keywords: ------------------------+--------------------------------------------------- Changes (by levill_r): * priority: critical => major * summary: Rename (graph-related) util::node as util::vertex => Have util::vertex and util::edge be distinct types Old description:
* ~~We have two `mln::util::node` types : one for the graph implementation and also one for the tree. See source:/trunk/milena/mln/util/tree.hh and source:/trunk/milena/mln/util/internal/graph_base.hh. Remove this name clash.~~ (Fixed; Matthieu Garrigues renamed the tree-related `mln::util::node` in r1749.) * Anyway, the graph-related `mln::util::node` should be renamed as `mln::util::vertex`. * Even better: `mln::util::vertex` and `mln::util::edge` should be given two distinct, incompatible types, like Vaucanson's graph item handlers (ask Roland for more details).
New description: * ~~We have two `mln::util::node` types : one for the graph implementation and also one for the tree. See source:/trunk/milena/mln/util/tree.hh and source:/trunk/milena/mln/util/internal/graph_base.hh. Remove this name clash.~~ (Fixed; Matthieu Garrigues renamed the tree-related `mln::util::node` in r1749.) * ~~Anyway, the graph-related `mln::util::node` should be renamed as `mln::util::vertex`~~ (done in r1993). * Even better: `mln::util::vertex` and `mln::util::edge` should be given two distinct, incompatible types, like Vaucanson's graph item handlers (ask Roland for more details). Comment: s/`util::node`/`util::vertex`/ (r1993). -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.lrde.org/olena/ticket/135#comment:3> Olena <http://olena.lrde.epita.fr> Olena, a generic and efficient C++ image processing library.